Do you remember when Lady Gaga protested the use of fur by wearing this?
And here's a video of 5 of the rescued Beagles that are now safe from harm thanks to these amazing people.
Lady Gaga....eat shit and die. Then click HERE.
To end....here's a list of designers and clothing manufacturers that do not use fur.
"I thought it was commentary on not wearing fur, because I hate fur and don't wear fur"
-- Lady Gaga --
After coming under fire by PETA for wearing the Jana Sterbak meat dress rip off, Stefani signed an anti-fur campaign along side other artists such as Pink and Mariah Carey.
How very noble of her. It seems she had a change of heart or she is just a lying, no good hypocrite. Pictures such as these started popping up.
Now, I don't know for sure if the fur in the pictures above are fake but if they are then why is Stefani using designers such as Armani, Versace and Moschino to design her costumes on the Born This Way Ball Tour. Armani, Versace and Moschino are designers that use fur.
How can you possibly be against fur yet engage the services of the slaughter fashion houses that she's employed? Just further proof that Stefani is a fake and fraud.
Lady I Hate Money and I'm so Lower East Side went on to say "It's been my life's dream to be dressed in Italian designers."
Really? That's a life dream of someone who hates money? Should that even be a life dream? This further shows how Stefani is a materialistic, insecure and shallow individual who's totally consumed by appearances and being validated by "names".
Someone who hates money does not care for these things yet Gaga does and she supports the slaughter of innocent animals for her vanity and fashion.
This is what the lying sack of shit supports.
 |
| A fox being electrocuted through the Anus for its fur and a skinned fox for his fur. |
 |
| Dogs in cages used in the Chinese fur industry. |
Most fur is made in China and no doubt these so called high end fashion designers are getting most of their fur there. The problem is that the fur is mislabeled as rabbit, fox or mink when the consumer is really wearing man's best friend.
When you see the above pictures, how can anyone with a heart, no, a soul, think this is acceptable! It is not, no matter what the animal is. Only sick, demented, cold hearted, materialistic, shallow people accept this. A caring, compassionate person would be sickened by this. Fashion would not and should not supersede what is torturous and cruel. This is not an opinion, it's a fact.
 |
| Dogs being skinned alive for fur. For the fashion Lady Gaga supports by using designers that use fur. |
If you think fur is OK, you're an asshole. That is an opinion.....and get the fuck off my blog.
For a complete list of designers that use fur, click HERE.
If you want to respect something, respect the Green Hill Occupiers in Montichiari, Italy. Green Hill is an American company owned by Marshall BioResource, a pathetic company which breeds animals, including dogs for laboratory research.
On April 28th, 2012, over 1000 protesters marched up to Green Hill in the Italian countryside and found a breach in the fence, broke in and rescued 30 Beagles doomed to misery. Thousands remain. The protesters formed a human chain and passed each dog until they reached the fence and were handed over the barbed wire and given to people waiting on the other side.
It's been confirmed that several of the Beagles have already had their vocal chords cut.
This group of people have hearts and embody compassion and love.
Click HERE to see the pictures. Here's a video of the amazing event. Sorry, it's in Italian.
And here's a video of 5 of the rescued Beagles that are now safe from harm thanks to these amazing people.
 |
| Puppy victory! |
Lady Gaga....eat shit and die. Then click HERE.
To end....here's a list of designers and clothing manufacturers that do not use fur.
I want to throw up and burn my gags cds that are somewhere in my room. I knew she was a phony about fur. Just sick!
ReplyDeletePeta is pretty phony about stuff they do... I saw a Paula dean add and she was riding a turkey. Aren't they against all meat stuff??? Then they had khloe kardashian as a spokes person but her sissters wear fur.. wtf. I mean they need to get all of their priorities together and use vegan anti fur people.
ReplyDeleteI AGREE WITH YOU! It's similar to how people want Gay icons who aren't gay. Peta needs a spokes person who is a vegan!
DeleteRight. Fuck the fakers and bring the real deals!!!!!!
Deletehttp://www.petakillsanimals.com/
Delete^ Again agreeing with Hurt. PETA is no better when it comes to killing animals. Their original cause was perverted LONG ago.
Deletethe sickest thing i read on gagacheat (i think) is dat sumwhere where the olympics took place, sum days b4 the olympics startid sum organizations pickd up all dem stray dawgs n cats from da streets n poisoned dem so tourist wouldnt c em wonderin
Deletei guess dats what happens wit all the dawgs dat r supposedly helpd by peta; killd 4 whatever reasons
:'(
http://dogslifemagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/hand-holding-paw-web.jpg
paws up dawgz
did u listen 2 born villain yet!?
It's not a black and white issue though. I was reading up on it before and one of the things PETA said was that the reason they have so many animal deaths on their hands is because many of the animals they get have to be euthanized. Whether it is because they are sick or injured or whatever. It's like a place being a no-kill shelther... it looks good on the outside but really they have to turn many animals away in that case and a lot of them are just killed by the owner in another way, for example by abandoning it in the woods or throwing it into a river. I know it sounds bad, and it is, but that's the sad truth. If someone wants to dump their 10 year old dog, they will dump him; regardless of where or how. (Which I find disgusting, actually the first dog I adopted was a senior. I adopted him at 8 years old and he is now 10). So is it better to have an animal suffer or is it better to have it die a painless death due to euthanasia?
DeleteI'm also pretty sure you can check their websites to see if its real or fake. I know that they always use the real deal in photoshoots. Just Google search it.
ReplyDeletePlease take down the pictures of the animals....
ReplyDeleteI know it's hard to look at but I had to bring the point home so that people can really understand the reality of the fur industry.
DeletePlease keep the pictures up. They were an eye opener for me and hopefully will be for others as well. It's much easier to look the other way or to minimize the points protesters make when one isn't able to see or hear.
DeleteI can take and see anything but I just cannot bring myself to see any ounce of animal abuse period.....Get's me sooooo angry
DeleteHey Miss Stef, you were uncertain if the fur in the pictures above are fakes, well, I've researched and found that the photo of Lady Gag wearing the White Coat with Black Hat is indeed from a designer that use fur, Alexander McQueen. (See Vanity Fair, January 2009 insert cover and read the fine prints at the Top-Left)
ReplyDeleteNow, the next photo: I have here a link where she posed with the exact pink coat for Vanity Fair shoot. Check out the link, use the Zoom magnifier and hover over the tiny description. It reads, Gaga wears a coat by Michael Kors.
Also, you won't believe what she quoted there, too. DISGUSTING!
Are you sure about the last link?? It shows her has marlyin Monroe.
Deletehttp://socialitelife.com/photos/lady-gaga-covers-januarys-vanity-fair-talks-bad-romance-photos/lady-gaga-vanity-fair-11282011-05
DeleteFake fur and real fur is kinda the same in some ways. Just not from an animal but still implies what look you're going for. Both are bad
ReplyDeleteCome off it. Nature makes furry-looking things that aren't made from animal.
DeleteFake fur is fine because it's fake. I personally don't have a problem with fake fur
DeleteWhen it comes down to it, fake fur is what your childhood cuddly toys are made off, and they don't get campaigned against. So when it comes to clothes it's better to have fake because if it's higher quality then it's pretty close to the real thing (which should stay on the animal)meaning it's cheaper then real fur, easier to keep, healthier for your morals etc and therefore more accessible to the consumer. So people won't save up hundreds and hundreds for some group of Dalmatians somewhere on the other side of the world to be slaughtered for one jacket, the money won't go to the people who skin the animals, thus making them lose profit and shut down and the consumer will have more money during this time of economic crisis.
DeleteI understand what you're trying to say, but people like the furry effect. 'Furry' from an early age is a comfort thing for many - from cuddling teddy bears when frightened to cuddly pets - so it would be hard to make people stop wanting the furry effect completely, but we can deal with it by manufacturing high quality fake fur for products and not inhumanely massacre confused, innocent animals.
Exactly.
DeleteI can say I don't care very much for the disgraceful opinions of any or most all of you and the truth is GaGa can wear whatever it is she pleases. She can also afford things you will never be able to afford, even of you worked 10 jobs. I can afford these upper class things and a lot of jealous washed up hags hate me too. I don't even give two shits.
ReplyDeleteThat's a very ignorant statement. Never be able to afford. I'm sorry do you know us?? Have fun seeing gagme in hell with all your furs stupied cunt.
DeleteThen why did you comment if you don't care?? Seriously people like you make me laugh. You just ruined your whole statement.
DeleteLet's skin you and see how you like it!
DeleteYou Anonymous 11:32PM are a disgraceful person. I hope some animal rips your head off some day.
DeleteAnd I hope some day an animal punches you in your twat and eats you whole.
Delete"I can say I don't care very much for the disgraceful opinions of any or most all of you and the truth is GaGa can wear whatever it is she pleases. She can also afford things you will never be able to afford, even of you worked 10 jobs. I can afford these upper class things and a lot of jealous washed up hags hate me too. I don't even give two shits."
DeleteYeah, as if her selfabsorbed moonfaced stompy pubescent fans from the sticks are that clientele.
Yes, she can wear whatever she pleases, but when she abandons her stances on things like fur and some-such for shallow reasons like wanting to be dressed by Italian designers and for advocating for the cruelty of the fur trade by wearing fur products, that's when we have a problem with her. Hypocritical and downright nasty, she should have been shot down for this ages ago by those in her industry who do firmly stand against the fur trade.
DeleteAnd...what has earnings got to do with this? Lady Gaga could be the richest woman in the world and she would still have the choice of choosing to wear fur or not. Just because you're on a high income doesn't mean you have to automatically 'upgrade' to real fur or expensive Italian designers.
In truth, your comment sounded as if you just wanted to boost about your earnings rather then the actual content of the blog and blog post.
*boast about your earnings
DeleteAnon 11:32: you are obviously very self-absorbed if you seriously think anyone who looks at you disapprovingly while you wear fur is "jealous". This is what you WANT to think because it is easier for your brain to wrap around a self-serving, ego-boosting falsehood. Truth is not that easy, and I feel very sad for you that you think the war on fur is merely about fashion & societal class.
DeleteI would also highly advise you to quit your commenting about the status of anyone else - the vast majority of the people I know have 6-figure incomes - and not one of them wears fur.
First time I have made a comment, but to Anonymous ar 11.32 I make good money and I dont wear fur out of choice, dont assume people dont wear fur because they cannot afford it. Have you ever considered that the reason these "hags" hate you is not because of what you have, but simply because your an arrogant cunt?
ReplyDeleteMoney can buy you fur, it cant buy you class sweetheart.
Someones sensitive... By the way you "wear" fur because you can? That's even dumber than the other things you have said.
Delete"Someones sensitive... By the way you "wear" fur because you can?"
DeleteHow is someone who "wear(s) fur because (they) can" sensitive ?
Well I'm a vegetarian so in regards to this "If you think fur is OK, you're an asshole. That is an opinion.....and get the fuck off my blog."
ReplyDeleteI could also quite happily say that about meat eaters.
Unless you are a vegetarian I don't think you really have the right to judge people for fur. I don't know if that fur Gaga is wearing is real and since I don't know that I won't judge. I also don't know if the meat dress was real still to this day so am not judging on that but seriously Miss Stef, I don't think you can say what you said if you do eat meat.
fur and meat are different though. fur is a high price commodity whereas meat is usually less expensive than vegetables due to government subsidies to corn growers to grow corn to feed cows for fast food companies that lobby to get their materials (meat) cheap. i'm sure a lot of people would like to switch to a vegetarian, vegan, organic diet, but it's more expensive and impractical for a lot of families on the grind. fur is just plain expensive and impractical and i can only imagine assholes or the inuit wearing it espeically when gagas walking around in fur and there isn't even any snow on the ground.
DeleteActually I probably shouldn't be so harsh Miss Stef, I just thought your tone was kinda aggressive and I'm not sure if you eat meat or not but if you ever watched Earthlings the DVD you'd see - what happens in abbotoirs is just as horrifying as the fur trade. This is one time I WILL defend my nemisis Madonna - she does appear from the books I read to be a vegetarian! And I don't think I've seen her wear fur.
ReplyDeleteAs for what Gaga is doing, it's clear she just spouts off whatever is in her head that day during interviews, and doesn't seem to realise, she's a major celebrity - this stuff goes in print, and on the net, never to be removed. If what Scorpia Rising says is true (and I hope they ARE speaking the truth and not just using this as a cheap shot at Gaga) then Gaga needs a kick in the head. You DO NOT denounce the wearing of fur and then go and wear it.
This is one time I WILL defend my nemisis Madonna - she does appear from the books I read to be a vegetarian! And I don't think I've seen her wear fur.
Delete^
THIS is the second thing (im the 1st) that makes the comment section of dis blog bad
madona wears real fur
both u n miss stef r wrong (sorry bitch)
u for beein unable 2 do a simple google search
n miss stef 4 bashin gaga 4 assumin she wears real fur while at the same tiem is a fan of madonna who does wear real fur =/
but i saw once on gagacheat miss stef posted a completely gaga-irrelevant articl (liek she does sumtiems) bout janet jackson wearin/promotin fur. dis anon jus said madona seems 2 b a vegeterian; she actually is
http://theinformedvegan.com/post/2841557745/madonna-too-vegan-for-cnn-piers-morgan
doesnt dis make her 10x tiems more of a hypocrite than gaga n jackson? she may not be doin fur ads but bein vegeterian n wearin fur? ugh.
as a 3yrs old devoded little monster wit a paw tattoo on my back n forehead i will b disgusted if gaga wears fur (not only bcuz she said we wouldnt c her wearin it but generally bcuz its horrible) but if im gon read bout it in an article id prefer it if it wasnt written my a madonna fan :/ sorry but dis is by far the worst article/accusasion a madonna fan could throw against gaga
y dont we stick 2 lipsyncin, empty stadiums n stage copyin articles?
keep it real homies
~
#noshadejustbeinhonest
I think Madonna's use of her is horrible as well. I've seen pictures of her wearing fur. I know Stella McCartney tried to convince her to stop wearing it a few years back. I think it might have worked because I haven't seen Madonna wearing fur for a good while. Don't know for sure though. Until I do, I don't buy her music or plan to go to her concert.
DeleteI only found 1 pic of her wearing fur.
DeleteAt least Madonna endorses H&M "cruelty-free" clothing lines.
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vGZ76iJdToU
H&M: We won't screw over the animals, but we will screw over the individual artist! We joyously scour the internet for new & bold designs, and we will steal any image so we can get it to you at a lower, mass-produced price! Shop today!
DeleteOr at least, that's what H&M SHOULD be advertising. *sigh* The world of business sucks ass.
http://www.regretsy.com/2012/01/24/hm-is-awesome/
Delete^ For what I'm talking about. H&M isn't the only big company to do this. Different topic, I know, but just because a company does good one way doesn't mean they do good in all ways.
k anon 11:39
Deletelet the "at least" excuses start
at least madona never says she doesnt lipsync
at least madona didnt have a 99c sale album deal
at least madona endorses h&m cruelty-free clothing lines
dont u c dat wat ur sayin right now makes her MORE of a hypocrite?
"im gonna wear hundreds of dollars cost furs BUT I'M ENDORSING H&M SO ITS ALL OK"
at least i once thought madona fans were more grown up & mature but u's probably all a bunch of kids as well.
when it comes 2 fur n animal cruelty, madona fans r the last ones 2 talk. or worse blame another artist for that matter. period.
They are more grown-up and mature, definately more so than you. By a long shot.
DeleteMost of the time your arguments don't even make sense, are deflecting the issue or are false.
im not wrong in dis one
Deleteplus they're shit
jumpin down monsters throats 4 the 99c forgettin about THIS:
Daily Mail is also reporting "185,000 copies of MDNA were sold as part of the ticket package deal. If this figure is correct it would therefore mean that only 179,000 copies counted as individual album sales. And if she hadn't included the albums with her concert tickets, she would have landed in the number two position, behind Lionel Richie's Tuskegee, which sold 199,000 copies in the same week she topped the chart."
wat of my previous arguements exactly dont make sense? i rly wanna kno. doesnt it make sense 2 u dat madona fans r bitchin bout gaga bein a hypocrite wit dem furs but madona does dat 10x by bein a vegeterian while wearin fur? doesnt it make sense 2 u dat madona fans r bitchin bout dem 99c sale while madona gave a free album wit erry ticket 4 mdna tour? dat mean fan bought the album, then probably 90% of them bought tickets 2, so they had the album twice.
"at least" gagas albums sold without the 99c sale r more than anythin mdna sold; yes im countin the packade deal ones.
And here you are ♥ＨＵＲＴ♥
Deletespamming the shit out of this blog with this Born Villain and supporting your fur-wearing maniac Marilyn Manson.
http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a205/mailorder_messiah/Marilyn%20Manson/MansonFurCoat.jpg
http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kyjkzyC9E51qaktw9o1_400.jpg
then read this
http://dalje.com/en-lifestyle/photo-peta-slams-stars-for-wearing-fur-and-leather/125573
and the fact that you are also a LadyWhore fan
makes you a two-time LOSER and a hypocrite lil' cunt!!
did i ever support manson wearin fur?
Deleteunlike madonna n gaga, manson never claimed he loves animals, he is a vegeterian n we's never gonna c him wearin fur.
no hypocricy there. case dismissed.
i think killing a animal for fun is wrong or killing it in a inhuman way is wrong too im jewish so our meat is kill in a painless way i wish meat places would do the same
ReplyDeletesieg heil
DeleteGaga's fans are so outdated, they think comments like that are still relevant/edgy.
Delete*stomps along like a moonfaced twat*
hitler is the new black
Deleteow
Sorry, but with you nothing is "new"
Deletecompard 2 ur fresh n exciting comments dat give erry1 here the chills
DeleteHurt, YOU give me the chills. You thrill me. You're da best!
DeleteYou thrill me
Surround me, you fill me
You send me
You put me in a trance
You fill me
Inside me you take me
You thrill me
You put me in a trance
STRIKE A POSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111
DeleteVOGUE
VOGUE
STRIKE A POSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111
You should feel embarrassed for yourself. Or do you and that is why you're always acting out ?
Deletedeep inside im actually very embarassed of myself dat i posted dis comment. i cried myself 2 sleep yesterday. forgive me lawd 4 i have sinnd
Deleteif its real im never listenin 2 her music agian :(
ReplyDeleteThose are real go visit the the websites of the designers.
ReplyDeleteI think the last one may be fake fur and the other one (dusky flesh) may be marabou.
ReplyDeleteWow there is a lot of sensitive people on this blog. If you didn't realize gags is a public figure, not some stranger you see in a bar then decide to make a blog about them. People have the right to say whatever the fuck they want. Gags chooses to make these dumb statements they should be ripped by people. I am vegiterian and that meat dress was REAL they even said it a billion times on the news/web. Even if it was meat it should of been feed to starving people. Not worn for an hour. Those furs are real. My friend is into fashion and said so. Kors has been ripped numerous times for using fur. It is weird that someone who says I hate money but "dress me in designer clothes" her head must be lose. I stopped liking her right after the monsterball but the meat dress pushed me off the edge. There have been pictures of designers using meat in fashion now and using fish as well. It's pretty disgusting. I saw an octopus dress once. Who would wear that is beyond me. I can't belive Peta would support her but they support anyone who says " I hate fur" action speaks louder. Wheres her red paint? Oh that's right she's protected. Can't stand hypocrites.
ReplyDelete"Wow there is a lot of sensitive people on this blog. If you didn't realize gags is a public figure, not some stranger you see in a bar then decide to make a blog about them. People have the right to say whatever the fuck they want. Gags chooses to make these dumb statements they should be ripped by people."
DeleteCan you elaborate ? You seem to be contradicting yourself there ?
"I am vegiterian and that meat dress was REAL they even said it a billion times on the news/web. Even if it was meat it should of been feed to starving people. Not worn for an hour. Those furs are real."
Why do you say "Wow there is a lot of sensitive people on this blog", then go on to say the quote above ?
"It is weird that someone who says I hate money but "dress me in designer clothes" her head must be lose. I stopped liking her right after the monsterball but the meat dress pushed me off the edge. There have been pictures of designers using meat in fashion now and using fish as well. It's pretty disgusting. I saw an octopus dress once."
Here also ?
lol
wtf
You're not forming coherent thoughts, @06:33 AM
DeleteAlso, what's wrong with being sensitive ?
(If you actually understand what it means, judging by your thoughtprocess, one wouldn't think so)
I don't think PETA supports her. I think PETA supported her when she was anti-fur. Anything I have read regarding PETA and Gags is that they liked her anti-fur message, they were offended by the meat dress, and PETA India suggested she wear a lettuce-dress when she visits there.
DeleteThe one about the beagles made me cry. Thank you Miss Stef for posting this. :)
ReplyDeletehttp://www.fur.org/designers-2011/?album=7&gallery=179
ReplyDeleteOh, yeah, doesn't look like marabou, although you can get furcopies these days that look pretty identical to the real thing.
Deletehttp://www.hollyscoop.com/lady-gaga/pictures/274
ReplyDeleteHere is another one.
Looks quite fake.
DeleteThe No Fur list has some companies that use shoddy production ethics, plagiarisations etc . . . .
ReplyDeletehmmm
Would like to see a more ethical list
She is quiet the hypocrite. If she actually cared about anti fur she would not wear it or stop wearing their clothes all together. Someone that is anti fur and is anti meat is P!nk.
ReplyDeleteWhat don't some of you get. It's real fur. Pointed out by scorpia and a few others. She has said that she is against it. But wearing it makes her a hypocrite. That meat dress didn't make any sence because she had many things behind it.
ReplyDeleteThe meat dress had no meaning whatsoever. She just wore it for schock value. I remember hearing her in interviews trying to come up with the reasons behind it. She couldn't clearly say what the meaning behind it was. She even went on to say that the DADT poicy was the prime rib of America at that rally she attended on the East Coast. I wouldn't say she's an idiot, but I don't think she thinks about what she's saying until after the fact that she said it.
DeleteI can't wait for someone else to come along so that the media stops paying attention to the this attention starving whore.
oh its pointed out by scorpia ok good
Delete"She couldn't clearly say what the meaning behind it was. She even went on to say that the DADT poicy was the prime rib of America at that rally she attended on the East Coast. I wouldn't say she's an idiot, but I don't think she thinks about what she's saying until after the fact that she said it."
DeleteI think she often comes across as if she doesn't know what she is talking about. When she talks about things of the field that is my occupation/expertise, you can tell she has absolutely no clue, and that she must have someone like a ghostwriter (probably a team of [also amateurish] "experts"). Some of the crock I've read is so laughable, you really get the impression she has no idea and just runs along with it.
hey pike born villain is out go download dat shit or buy it if u gat dem $s im buyin it 2morow
ReplyDelete....That music video is not for the faint of heart.
Deletewhat's born villain?
Deletenever mind! MANSON!
DeleteJust bought it. :)
Delete@pike: im assumin u mean the long mini-movie born villain trailer video?
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hB0Dp9TrR1c
im talkin bout da album lol check the song "born villain" its orgasm 2 the ears check it out
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5gJBXa1a3o
also "pistol whipped"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUTPktNOMeE
@miss stef: GURLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL~*
when he's talking in the video is all of it Shakespeare or just the first part from macbeth?
Deletehttp://www.vogue.com/collections/fall-2011/alexander-mcqueen/review/
ReplyDelete"women stalked by in their zippered silhouettes sprouting fox-fur shoulders"
http://nicehobbies.org/white-fox
"Poor baby" :(
http://slow33.com/2011/11/29/gaga-fashion-white-fur-on-a-speeding-boat/
Stupied bitch.
hey do u remember a bitch comin here n sayin shed make a blog bout gaga n how reductive she is n blah blah blah gagacheat v2.0
ReplyDeletehere it is:
reductiveworld.blogspot.com
ripping off gagacheat from head to toes
If you're talking about the hypocrisy post that was posted before this with the fur.
Deletemiss stef has adressed the fur issue months ago n also the whole blog is gagacheat v2.0
Deleteif we gon have mor anti-gaga blogs we gotta c new things from each blog seperately, not recycled stuff
between pawsdownlittlemonsters reductiveworld n gagacheat, gagacheat cums 1st
I checked out reductive world last night and I saw the fur post after I posted mine. I saw that reductive world's came first in this case. It was a total, complete fluke that we both touched on the same issue. Seriously.
DeleteHurt, everytime you type "cums" I get misty down there if you know what I mean.
Delete"Surely, whoever speaks to me in the right voice, him, her or it (Hurt)I shall follow"
"hey do u remember a bitch comin here n sayin shed make a blog bout gaga n how reductive she is n blah blah blah gagacheat v2.0
Deletehere it is:
reductiveworld.blogspot.com
ripping off gagacheat from head to toes"
You should love it there
Reductive world blows. Miss Stef no one here thinks you copied it, considering you already have posted on this issue before, as hurt said, and also reductive world has nothing original just two stories that are copies of the two other anti gaga blogs (yours and paws)
DeleteWhat use does a copy serve ? Oh yeah, one could ask the same about "Gaga" ?
DeleteReductiveworld's opener: " We have scene and heard "
Since were on the topic of this. How much do you wana bet those Alexander mcqueen armadillo heels are made with real reptile skin?? Anyone know? It looks very real.
ReplyDeleteSame here! Also mcqueen uses a lot of fur and other animal type stuff. Very disgusting.
Deletei dont give a shit about fur or meat or gay ppl what i do care is about the children of this world why do we make a big deal about gays and fur and meat all of us should care and pay more attention to children that are abuse or used as sex slave or being killed we need to stand up for children and save them i dont see any celerity doing this kind of stuff all i see is gay and animal right what what about more importantly the children of the earth
ReplyDeleteWe all have issues that touch us, some more than others. Children are important of course. I don't know why they aren't as popular among celebrities. The only one I can think of, sorry two, off the top of my head are Ricky Martin (child sex slave trade) and Oprah Winfrey (child abuse).
DeleteA comma, here or there, please. *eyes glaze over*
DeleteHere is a good laugh
ReplyDeletehttp://pawsdownlittlemonsters.tumblr.com/post/22276768997/madonna-shuffles-on-madonna-shuffling-on-lady
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha that's fucking hilarious. She looks like a little fairy and that guys face is priceless. Omg! Haha
DeleteYeah, that was pretty damn funny. Her body guard is like "WTF?" He looked like he didn't know what to do.
DeleteI can never understand why GagMe wears those huge ass platform shoes when she can't even walk in the them. What a fool.
To be fair she falls all the time anyway. Remember the You and I performance where she dressed as that embarrassing Joe Calderone character and ate shit right in front of Brian May?
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTp2jqHczUU
Ha ha ha ha ha! I had never seen this video before. I just wish they had shown the whole thing when she hit the floor instead of cutting to the audience.
DeleteThanks Pike!
Look at Brian May shaking his head like "WTF" after she falls. LOL
DeleteAs a decent member of the human race i hope the next time this horrible furhag falls she breaks her stupid neck
DeleteI admit I like meat, but there's a difference between animals being killed for food and animals being killed for fashion. Animals being killed for food is for survival. We need to eat. Even in the wild there are animals that hunt other animals. Animals being killed for fashion is just plain wrong. GagMe says she doesn't like fur because she doesn't like animals being killed for fashion, then she shows up in a meat dress. How many hungry families could that meat have fed? Especially with today's economy she could have donated that to needy families but instead decided that it would make something interesting to wear. Does anybody call her out on it? Well nobody in the mainstream media does at least. Then she starts wearing furs, once again nobody in the mainstream media calls her out on her hypocrisy. It's another reason why this woman makes me sick.
ReplyDeleteAnd why is it that the American media protects her? Us magazine and MTV have been posting nothing but positive notes about her (not so) sold out concert in Korea.
DeleteNot sure which one of them reported that she opened her show to 60,000 fans. The first reports from Korea was 45,000 and the stadium has a capacity for 72,000 which means it wasn't sold out and by looking at some of the pictures the stadium was not full. But the (American) media chooses to ignore those details.
I agree meat contains nutrients that some people need. And if you watch how meat is made then how fur is made. You will be shocked to find out which one is worse. And that is fur.
DeleteI totally agree. I'm sure this may receive some backlash, but I am not against leather, nor am I against using cow to create a fur statement (basically, many shoe vendors use cow, and have them dyed in various animal prints to give off the look of fur.) Call it that my parents came from a farm, but I understand the use of animal for feeding, and the leather purposes. Killing an animal for its fur is disgusting.
DeleteOn that note, I find it interesting to see that Jones stopped using fur for their Enzo Angiolini brand. I remember they used rabbit fur for that brand, and their Nine West Studio line years ago.
well, not so sure.
Deletepigs for exaple are beaten to death before they are slauthered to meat.. just beacause people who are use to kill animals become mean at a certain point.
but even if the animal is killed fast and painless, the are raised in a terrible conditions.
i used to think like you, then i watced this - http://gary-tv.com/index.htm
if you dont want to be a hypocrit, watch this and then decide.
Well said Thanks for that
Deletedidn't GagGag say in an interview that she only wears faux fur?
ReplyDeleteno need for the PETA propaganda
lol PETA... when has that organization ever been taken seriously? They make real animal activists look stupid. Anyways, I think the job of those in the public is usually to cook up as much lies as they can and say it so much people will believe them. This seems to be true for Lady Gaga in this case with fur.
ReplyDeleteNo midnight, you make yourself look stupid because you don't seem to be able to see the point at all. It's not about PETA and its not about you, or me. It's about promoting and condoning cruelty to animals. You think because you call AR people liars it must automatically make it so. It is the head in the sand sycophantic followers of these vile 'role models' who are deluded. There are hundreds of respected animal rights groups out there who can give you irrefutable proof of the animal cruelty behind the glamour of the fur trade. There is legislation about to be rolled out across the European Union concerning furfarm cruelty, and in Switzerland the rules are so tight on animal welfare that no fur farms can begin to operate. Many countries including Britain have already banned fur farms, and Israel has not only banned fur farming, but has banned fur from all stores and boutiques. Does it ever cross your tiny mind WHY all this is happening around you? Perhaps you have some important inside information that you might share with the rest of us which will prove that governments of whole countries are liars just out to hurt gaga's image. A bit of extra information for you is that the finished product is not regulated by any health and safety rules and fur clothing contains many toxins including formadehyde which is carcinogenic. A respected German scientific laboroatory carried out a series of tests last year for FourPaws. You can easily find the article online and read it for yourself. Children's clothing was found to be particularly harmful.
Deletethese people should be stoned to death. no less... and right before they take their last breath, skin them alive.
ReplyDeletea veagen here.....
Why some people make fuss about fur wearing? A beautiful woman, like Lady Gaga, more beautiful and elegant in fur.
ReplyDeleteIt is no help for farm animals, if somebody grumble because of fur wearing. I think, it's just envy.
Tominator
Gaga, gross. that dude is ugly..
ReplyDeleteGaga, That dude is gross
ReplyDeleteGaga, that dude is ugly.
ReplyDeleteWhy do these shit for brains celebrities always evoke some kind of deity to try to make us believe they are the the most gorgeous lovable things on the planet. God had no part in making that vile looking monster. Fake from her tits to her toe nails the only thing that looked real was the poor dead wolf she was posing with. Nasty woman #furhag
ReplyDelete